These far-left candidates lack a foreign policy

Lamont Colucci, associate professor and chair of the politics and government department, recently published an opinion piece for U.S. News & World Report about his perspective as interest in the coming election rises.

“Each time the United States and the United Kingdom have a general election, the far-left candidates delineate themselves by their domestic socialist, oftentimes Marxist rhetoric,” Colucci writes. “These tend to be attacks against global capitalism, free trade, local education and Christian values. What is amazingly missed by many, even in the media, is a focus on these candidates’ foreign policy, or lack thereof.”

He questions the foreign policy of up-and-coming Democrat candidate Bernie Sanders. “If the Obama Doctrine is a combination of a declinist mentality meeting the absence of strategy, the Sanders Doctrine would be the same thing on steroids,” he writes.

He points out that Sander’s own campaign website barely mentions international issues. Sanders also has pushed for a withdrawal from the World Trade Organization and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and calls for the end of America’s production of nuclear weapons.

“It’s difficult to decide what is more startling: that a far-left radical national security policy is taken seriously, or how close it is to the current occupant of the White House.” Colucci writes. “They both share the most damning policy in their view of international relations and national security: the lack of any real strategy at all.”

About “anti-American” British Labour Party candidate Jeremy Corbyn, he condemns Corbyn’s comparison of the Islamic State Group’s actions and those of American soldiers in the Middle East, and Corbyn’s push for a compromise between Britain and the Islamic State Group.

“One has to wonder if Corbyn thinks he would get such a compromise from the Islamic State group should it ever have his personal fate in its hands,” Colucci says. “Then again, modern international leftists never have to face such threats, and have always shielded themselves behind human rights rhetoric with no action.”

He says both candidates are highly similar, and “are both children playing the veritable fiddle while Rome burns, able to throw tantrums disguised as intellectualisms while the adults attempt to put the fires out.”

The full opinion piece can be read here.


Related Posts

Rafael Francisco Salas

Rafael Francisco Salas has work in regional exhibit opening May 18

Rafael Francisco Salas, professor of art and chair of the Department of Art and Art History, will have work included in “TMA Contemporary,” the annual […]

ben grady

Associate Professor of Biology Benjamin Grady quoted in article published by Forbes

Associate Professor of Biology Benjamin Grady was quoted in an article published April 30 by Forbes Australia. “This miner might change the future of the […]

Farewell and thank you to our 2023-24 retirees

MICHELE BARAN WITTLER ’76, 39 years Michele Baran Wittler ’76, associate dean of faculty and registrar, will retire from Ripon May 31. She started at […]

Jacoby Cefalu ’25, left,, and Ryan Davis ’24

Work of professor, students presented at cognitive development conference

Professor of Psychology Kristine A. Kovack-Lesh and two 2023 Summer Opportunities for Advanced Research (SOAR) students attended the biennial meeting of the Cognitive Development Society […]

Lamont Colucci